But what people fail to mention is that Brutus' speech was equally great. Brutus might come off as a traitor, and he is, but he had a point to prove. He killed Julius Caesar for the sake of Rome, as he put it. And his speech was effective as he stirred up a commotion among the people.
Student Answers pinkytune Student Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony - both of them at the market place in Caesar's funeral held a speech regarding Caesar. Marcus Brutus was not a mind-capturing speaker and was so a simple-tongued fellow.
Comparison And Contrast Of Brutus and Mark Anthony Funeral Speeches Which speech was more Persuasive? Mark Antony's speech was more persuasive than Brutus's simply because, Brutus was only trying to persuade the audience that killing Caesar was the right thing to do. Brutus vs Antony. 7 July Ancient Rome; After the assassination of Julius Caesar, his comrades Brutus and Antony both made speeches to the Roman people addressing his death. While Brutus asserts that he died for the good of the state and his remorse of his obligation to kill Caesar, Antony honors Caesar’s deeds to the state, and coerces. Brutus, who killed Cesar, tries to explain to the audience why he did such a thing, and Antony explains why what Brutus did was wrong. Although Brutus was a good orator and uses rhetoric well, Antony had the more persuasive speech overall.
Mark Antony, on the other hand, is a powerful orator with a extreme sense of bewitching the audience by his honey-filled words. Brutus, foolishly enough, let Mark Antony live after Antony vs brutus Julius Caesar.
This was one of his greatest mistakes in the story which caused nothing but, his doom.
As, said Brutus was not a powerful orator, however, still, as a result of being too idealist and having lack of experience in taking realistic decision, permitted Mark Antony to have a speech after him, which meant that he could oppose everything he said as well as can make a plot against him by enraging the folk.
The main objective of his speech was to explain the people why he killed Caesar and to convince them. He, as his goal was to be accomplished, explained the reason he killed Caesar in a simple but charming manner.
Though, his speech was somewhat attractive, but; he gave too idealistic proofs and really did not sum up any practical proofs dealing with reality. That shows that Brutus was well at giving idealistic speeches that could usually succeed in making its course but; he never gave any real proofs showing that why Caesar was ambitious, unfair as a dictator.
On the other counter; Mark Antony is the one who understood the common people and crowd psychology. He used many tactics to win the support of the crowd and turn them against the conspirators. He was also realistic and he gave many real examples supporting his case.
There are some evidences below: The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interred with their bones; So let it be with Caesar. Action - said Caesar was a true and faithful friend — Come I to speak in Caesar's funeral.
He was my friend, faithful and just to me: This part of the speech begins the praise of Caesar. Action — said Brutus was an honorable man after giving some real examples showing that what Brutus said of Caesar is not true. The noble Brutus Hath told you Caesar was ambitious: If it were so, it was a grievous fault, And grievously hath Caesar answer'd it.
Here, under leave of Brutus and the rest-- For Brutus is an honorable man; So are they all, all honorable men-- Come I to speak in Caesar's funeral. But Brutus says he was ambitious; And Brutus is an honorable man. He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill: Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?
When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept: Ambition should be made of sterner stuff: Yet Brutus says he was ambitious; And Brutus is an honorable man. You all did see that on the Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, Which he did thrice refuse: Yet Brutus says he was ambitious; And, sure, he is an honourable man.
I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, But here I am to speak what I do know. Action — Gave the practical example of Caesar refusing the crown — You all did see that on the Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, Which he did thrice refuse: It made the people remember for the first time a notable example of Caesar being astonishingly ambitionless that they had nearly forgotten.
You are not wood, you are not stones, but men; And, being men, bearing the will of Caesar, It will inflame you, it will make you mad: Then make a ring about the corpse of Caesar, And let me show you him that made the will.
Wherein hath Caesar thus deserved your loves? Alas, you know not: I must tell you then:Brutus and Mark Antony Speech Comparison; Mark Antony’s speech followed Brutus’s, so Mark Antony had to seem like he was helping out Brutus’s point.
He started with what seemed to be agreeing with Brutus but turned into a speech against the conpirators.
The basic difference between the funeral speeches of Brutus and Antony is that Brutus, characteristically, appeals to reason and logic, while Antony, characteristically, appeals to emotions.
The speeches given by both Brutus and Mark Antony in William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar are very persuasive to the audience that they are given to, but rhetorical devices were used in different ways in order for each to have an effect on the people of Rome.
In . The armies that fought in the Battle of Philippi were Mark Antony and Octavius versus Brutus and Cassius. Their war was declared by the Second Triumvirate as a civil war because it was used to retaliate Julius Caesar's assassination/5(5).
Antony VS Brutus Essay Sample. The conspirators depended on Marcus Brutus for one reason: to justify the murder of Julius Caesar. However after allowing Mark Antony to not only bring in the corpse of their beloved Caesar yet also speak after Brutus during the funeral, it would seem that Brutus’ role in the murder was pointless.
Brutus, who killed Cesar, tries to explain to the audience why he did such a thing, and Antony explains why what Brutus did was wrong. Although Brutus was a good orator and uses rhetoric well, Antony had the more persuasive speech overall.